Administrator Sebagai Representasi Deliberatif: Sebuah Bentuk Perbaikan Peran Pelayanan Publik

Main Article Content

Mostien

Abstract

It is recommended that the role of the public administrator as a representative be deliberative. The aim is to reapply the concept of representation in the context of public administration based on a literature review on the following concepts: 1) representative democracy, (2) representative bureaucracy, and (3) deliberative democracy. It was found that the dominant model of representative democracy was not suitable for guaranteeing the interests of citizens and society and that a representative bureaucracy was unsatisfactory for overcoming the failure of representative democracy. Finding promise in the model of deliberative democracy, consider how recon ceptualization of representation for administrative roles shapes the advancement of civic participation in order to improve the quality of representation. Specifically, the fourth construct is defined to add to the list of the top three: deliberative representations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mostien. (2023). Administrator Sebagai Representasi Deliberatif: Sebuah Bentuk Perbaikan Peran Pelayanan Publik. Irpia : Jurnal Ilmiah Riset Dan Pengembangan, 8(4), 54–67. Retrieved from http://ejournal.irpia.or.id/index.php/irpia-jurnal/article/view/192
Section
Articles

References

Adams, B. (2004). Public meetings and the democratic process. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 43–54.

Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.

Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Beirele, T. C., & Konisky, D. M. (2000).Values, conflict, and trust in participatory environmental planning. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(4), 587–602.

Box, R. C. (2004). Alternatives to representative primacy and administrative efficiency. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 26(4), 588–608.

Bozeman, B. (2002). Public value failure: When efficient markets may not do. Public Administration Review 62 (2), 134–151.

Bryer, T. A. (2009). Explaining responsiveness in collaboration: Administrator and citizen role perceptions. Public Administration Review, 69(2), 271–283.

Bryer, T. A. (2007a). Negotiating Bureaucratic Responsiveness in Collaboration with Citizens: Findings from Action Research in Los Angeles. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.

Bryer, T. A.. (2007b). Toward a relevant agenda for a responsive public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(3), 479–500.

Bryer, T. A., & Cooper, T. L. (2007). Challenges in Enhancing Responsiveness in Neighborhood Governance, Public Performance & Management Review, 31(2): 190–213.

Cooper, T. L. (1991). An ethic of citizenship for public administration. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Cooper, T. L., & Bryer, T. A. (2007). Collaboration between Los Angeles City Departments and Neighborhood Councils: Findings and Recommendations from the Collaborative Learning Project. Urban Institute Policy Brief, University of Southern California.

Cooper, T. L., Bryer, T. A., & Meek, J. W. (2006). Citizen-Centered col- laborative public management. Public Administration Review, 66(Special Issue), 76–88.

Cooper, T. L., Bryer, T. A., & Meek, J. W. (2008a). Outcomes achieved through citizen-centered collaborative public management. In R. O’Leary & L. Bingham (eds.), Big ideas in collaborative public management. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

Cooper, T. L., Bryer, T. A., & Meek, J. W. (2008b, September). From Collaborative Public Management to Collaborative Public Governance: Capacity Building for Sustainability. Presented at Minnowbrook 3 Conference, Lake Placid, NY.

Denzau, A. T. & Munger, M. C. (1986). Legislators and interest groups: How unorganized interests get represented. American Political Science Review, 80(1), 89–106.

Disch, L. J. (2002). The tyranny of the two-party system. New York: Columbia University Press.

Dolan, J., & Rosenbloom, D. H. (2003). Representative bureaucracy: Classic readings and continuing controversies. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.

Fiorina, M. P. (1970). Representatives, Roll calls and constituents. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

Follet, M. P. (1998). The new state: Group organization—The solution of popular government. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(Special Issue), 65–74.

Gastil, J. (2008). Political communication and deliberation. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Gastil, J. & Levine, P. eds. (2005). The deliberative democracy handbook: Strategies for effective civic engagement in the twenty-first century. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Guinier, L. (1994). The Tyranny of the Majority. Fundamental fairness in representative democracy. New York: Free Press.

Gunlicks, A. (2003). The lander and German federalism. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

Hill, L. B. (1991). Who governs the American administrative state? A bureaucratic-centered image of governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1(3), 261 294.

Hindera, J. J. (1993). Representative bureaucracy: Further evidence of active representation in the EEOC District Offices. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(4), 415–429.

Horner, L., Lekhi, R., & Blaug, R. (2006). Deliberative Democracy and the Role of public Managers Final Report of The Work Foundation’s Public Value Consortium, November.

Kakabadse, A., Kakabadse, N. K., & Kouzmin, A. (2008). Reinventing the Democratic Governance Project through information technology? A growing agenda for debate. In Nancy C. Roberts (ed.), The age of direct citizen participation (pp. 314–336). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.

Kathi, P. C. & Cooper, T. L. (2005). Democratizing the administra- tive state—Connecting neighborhood councils and city agencies. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 550–567.

King, C. S., Feltey, K., & Susel, B. O. (1998). The question of participation: Toward authentic public participation, Public Administration Review, 58, 317–327.

Kingsley, D. J. (1944). Representative bureaucracy: An interpretation of the British civil service. Yellow Springs, OH: Antioch Press.

Lipset, S. M. (1952). Bureaucracy and social change. In R. K. Merton, A. P. Gray, B. Hockey, & H. C. Selvin (Eds.), Reader in bureaucracy, New York: Free Press.

Lukensmeyer, C. J. & Torres, L. H. (2006). Public deliberation: A man- ager’s guide to public deliberation. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.

Macedo, S. et al. (2005). Democracy at risk: How political choices under- mine citizen participation and what we can do about it. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Mansbridge, J. (2003). Rethinking representation. American Political Science Review, 97(4), 515–528.

Mathews, D. (1999). Politics for people: Finding a responsible public voice (2nd ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Meier, K. C., & Nigro, L. G. (1976). Representative bureaucracy and pol- icy preferences: A study in the attitudes of federal executives. Public Administration Review, 36(July/August), 458–470.

Montanaro, L. (2008, April). Self- Authorized Representatives: Democratic Representation and Contemporary Politics. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois,.

Moore, M.H. (1995). Creating public value. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Mosher, F. C. (1968). Democracy and the public service. New York: Oxford University Press.

Nabatchi, T. (2008, September). Radical Individualism, Instrumental Rationality, and Public Administration: A Paper Formally Titled “Roofied and Rolled.” Presented at Minnowbrook 3 Conference, Blue Mountain Lake, New York,.

Nabatchi, T. (2010). Addressing the citizenship and democratic deficits: The potential of deliberative democracy for public administration. American Review of Public Administration, 40(4), 376–399.

Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Redman, E. (1973). The dance of legislation. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Reich, R.B. (1985). Public administration and public deliberation: An interpretive essay. The Yale Law Journal, 94(7), 1617–1641.

Rohr, J. A. (1986). To run a constitution: The legitimacy of the administra- tive state. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.

Rosener, J. B. (1978). Citizen participation: Can we measure its effective- ness? Public Administration Review, 38(5), 457–463.